For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and garagesale.es my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, forum.altaycoins.com and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, morphomics.science and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, wiki.rolandradio.net since rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, wiki.whenparked.com which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative functions should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' material on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its best carrying out industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their content, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public information from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the safety of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims against AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, funsilo.date music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.